- Сalifornia Psychological Inventory; personality; personnel; psychodiagnostics; professional selection; abilities; motivation
- https://doi.org/10.33099/2617-6858-2021-59-1-12-21
- Pages 12-21
The article is dedicated to the study of theoretical approaches to the development of the California Psychological Inventory (CPI) – a psychodiagnostic tool widely used in English-speaking countries since the 1950s by psychologists for professional selection and psychological support of personnel in various organizations, including law enforcement agencies. The article presents the theoretical foundation of the CPI, which is based on the orthogonal model of interaction between two primary personality dimensions – introversion and extraversion, as well as internality and externality. The authors convincingly argue for the feasibility of a Ukrainian-language adaptation of the CPI for use in work with law enforcement personnel, as the inventory allows for comprehensive psychological assessment of a range of important individual psychological traits, organized into four main categories related to: interpersonal relationships; self-management characteristics; motivation and cognitive style; and personal characteristics of the employee
References
1.Gough, H. G. & Bradley, P. (1996). The California Psychological Inventory™ manual - Third edition (2002 Printing). Mountain View, CA: CPP, Inc.
2.Gough, H. G. (2000). The California Psychological Inventory. In C. E. Watkins, Jr., & V. L. Campbell(Eds.), Testing and assessment in counseling practice (2nd ed.) (pp. 45-71). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
3.McAllister, L. W. (1996). A practical guide to CPI™ interpretation (3rd ed.). Mountain View, CA: CPP, Inc.
4.Megargee, E. I. (1972). The California Psychological Inventory handbook. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Meyer, P. & Davis, S. (1992). The CPI™ applications guide. Mountain View, CA: CPP, Inc.
5.Metodyky psykholohichnoi diahnostyky indyvidualno-psykholohichnykh osoblyvostei pratsivnykiv Natsionalnoi politsii Ukrainy: metodychni rekomendatsii [Methods of psychological diagnosis of individual psychological characteristics of employees of the National Police of Ukraine: guidelines] / Kryvolapchuk V.O, Syzonenko A.S., Ostapovych V.P., Barko V.I.; Kyiv: DNDI MVS Ukrainy, 2020 s (in Ukrainian).
6.Profesiohrafichnyi opys osnovnykh vydiv diialnosti v orhanakh vnutrishnikh sprav Ukrainy: prakt. Posib [Professional description of the main activities in the bodies of internal affairs of Ukraine]/ V. I. Barko, Yu. B. Irkhin, T. V. Neshcheret, O. V. Shapovalov. Kyiv: KNUVS, Drukarnia MVS, 2007. 100 s (in Ukrainian).
7.Bouchard C. Physical activity and health / C. Bouchard, S. N. Blair, W. L. Haskell. – Champaign : Human Kinetics, 2007. – 410 p.
8.CochraineR.E.,TettR.,L.Vandecreek. Psychological Testing and the Selection of Police OfficersA National Survey. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 30(5):511-537·October 2003. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/247743668
9.DunnetteM.D., BormanW.C. Personnel Selection and Classification Systems. Annual Review of Psychology. 1979. Vol. 30, No.1. Pp. 477–525. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ps.30.020179.002401
10.Gerald V. Barrett, Rosanna F. Miguel, Jennifer M. Hurd, Sarah B. Lueke and James A. Tan. Practical Issues in the Use of Personality Tests in Police Selection.Public Personnel Management Volume 32 No. 4 Winter 2003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/009102600303200403.