The Bulletin of National Defence University of Ukraine

  • Received 06.06.2021,
  • Revised 19.06.2021,
  • Accepted 02.09.2021
Download article Download article
Vol. 16, No. 3, 2021
  • game; confrontation; hybrid war; post-nonclassical science; strategic communications; talion; anthropocentrism; intersubjectivity
  • https://doi.org/10.33099/2617-6858-2021-61-3-115-122
  • Pages 115-122

The article explores the phenomenon of the game as a genetic source and program of a subject’s activity under the complex conditions of competitive struggle, including military confrontation. The expediency of applying the logic and principles of post-nonclassical scientific rationality in studying the regularities of confrontation in the military sphere is substantiated. The game-related aspects of human and social group activities in modern conditions of competition are specified, particularly in the context of information warfare

References

  1. Abramov, V.I., Sytnyk, H.P. (Red.), & Smolianiuk, V.F. (2016). Hlobalna ta natsionalna bezpeka. Kyiv : NADU. (in Ukrainian).
  2. Bzhezinskiy, Z. (1986). Plan igry: geostrategicheskaya struktura vedeniya borby mezhdu SShA i SSSR. Moskva : Progress. (in Russian).
  3. Guseltseva, M.S. (2015). Kulturno-analiticheskiy podkhod k izucheniyu evolyutsii psikhologicheskogo znaniya. PhD Thesis. Moskva. (in Russian).
  4. Davydov, V.V., Zaporozhеts, A.V., & Lomov, B.F. (1983). Psikhologicheskiy slovar. Moskva : Pedagogika. (in Russian).
  5. Kayua, R. (2007). Igry i lyudi. Stati i esse po sotsiologii kultury. Moskva. (in Russian).
  6. Mak-Kinsi, Dzh. (1960). Vvedenie v teoriyu igr. Moskva : Gos. izd. fiziko-matemat. lit. (in Russian).
  7. Novaya filosofskaya entsiklopediya (2010). (T. 1–4). (T.3). Moskva : Mysl. (in Russian).
  8. Rusnak, I.S. (Red.) (2017). Bila knyha antyterorystychnoi operatsii na Skhodi Ukrainy (2014–2016). Kyiv : NUOU. (in Ukrainian).
  9. Sytnyk, H.P. (2012). Derzhavne upravlinnia u sferi natsionalnoi bezpeky (kontseptualni ta orhanizatsiino-pravovi zasady). Kyiv : NADU. (in Ukrainian).
  10. Syrotenkо, A.M. (Red.) (2020). Voienni aspekty protydii “hibrydnii” ahresii: dosvid Ukrainy. Kyiv : NUOU im. Ivana Cherniakhovskoho. (in Ukrainian).
  11. Stepanov, O.M. (2006). Psykholohichna entsyklopediia. Kyiv : Akademvydav. (in Ukrainian).
  12. Filosofskyi entsyklopedychnyi slovnyk (2002). Kyiv : Abrys. (in Ukrainian).
  13. Furman, A.V., & Shandruk, S.K. (2014). Sutnist hry yak uchynennia. Ternopil : TNEU. (in Ukrainian).
  14. Khairulin, O.M. (2018). Psykholohichni vymiry ihrovoho modeliuvannia u viiskovii spravi. Psykholohiia i suspilstvo, 1–2, 83–108. (in Ukrainian).
  15. Khairulin, O.M. (2020). Hra iak psykholohichna prohrama zhyttiediialnosti subiekta. Psykholohiia i suspilstvo, 4, 24–53. https://doi.org/10.35774/pis2020.04.024
  16. . (in Ukrainian).
  17. Kheyzinga, Y. (2011). Homo ludens. Chelovek igrayushchiy. Sankt-Peterburg : Izd-vo Ivana Limbakha. (in Russian).
  18. Shelling, T. (2007). Strategiya konflikta. Moskva : IRISEN. (in Russian).
  19. Amos, C. (2017). Fox and Andrew J. Rossow, Making Sense of Russian Hybrid Warfare: A Brief Assessment of the Russo–Ukrainian War. The Institute of Land Warfare, ASSOCIATION OF THE UNITED STATES ARMY, LAND WARFARE PAPER, 112.
  20. AJP-3(B) Allied Joint Doctrine for the Conduct of Operations, STANAG 2490.
  21. Goldman, E. (2007). Strategic Communication: A Tool for Asymmetric Warfare. Small Wars Journal, 6.
  22. Roselle, L., Miskimmon, A., & O‘Loughlin, B. (2014). Strategic Narrative: A New Means to Understand Soft Power. Media, War & Conflict, 7(1), 70–84.
  23. Fleming, B.P. (2011). The Hybrid Threat Concept: Contemporary War, Military Planning and the Advent of Unrestricted Operational Art. Fort Leavenworth, KS: U.S. Army School of Advanced Military Studies (SAMS), U.S. Army Command & General Staff College.

Submission

 
Flag Counter