The Bulletin of National Defence University of Ukraine

  • Received 23.02.2024,
  • Revised 07.04.2024,
  • Accepted 23.05.2024
Download article Download article
Vol. 19, No. 3, 2024
  • contradictions; materialistic dialectics; the law of unity and the fight against contradictions; integration; disintegration
  • https://doi.org/10.33099/2617-6858-2024-79-3-32-39
  • Pages 32-39

Attention is focused on the unity and contradictions of the processes of integration and disintegration. An analysis of the concepts of integration and disintegration is presented, as well as a systematization of their features is developed. The problem of integration and disintegration is presented in various scientific fields, one of which is philosophy. The analysis of integration and disintegration processes in the context of materialistic dialectics testifies to their leading place in the philosophical knowledge of the laws of nature. The integration process is characterized by a combination of heterogeneous elements, disintegration – disintegration, destruction of the whole into parts. These processes, along with the unity of their functioning, are characterized by contradictory conclusions. A contradiction is universal in nature, since in any phenomenon there is a system of interacting contradictions, where one of them expresses the struggle of internal forces (internal contradiction), and the other characterizes the connection with the outside world (external contradiction). It has been established that in philosophy the problem of integration and disintegration is presented through close concepts of materialistic dialectics: opposite, polarity, contradiction, antinomy, antagonism. The analysis of the concepts of the law of unity and the struggle of contradictions made it possible to clarify the essence of the integration-disintegration processes and to assert that they are characterized by the unity of functioning, which is based on different but internally related processes of opposite phenomena

References

  1. Petrushenko V. L. (2009). Tlumachnyi slovnyk osnovnykh filosofskykh [Explanatory dictionary of basic philosophical terms]. Vydavnytstvo Lvivskoi politekhniky. (in Ukrainian)
  2. Kozyrieva N. V. (2018). Slovnyk-dovidnyk dlia pidhotovky do praktychnykh zaniat ta samostiinoi roboty z navchalnoi dystsypliny «Filosofiia» [A reference dictionary for preparing for practical classes and independent work in the academic discipline "Philosophy"]. KhNUMH im. O. M. Beketova. (in Ukrainian)
  3. Stepanov O.M. (2006). Psykhologhichna encyklopedija. Vid A do Ja. [Psychological encyclopedia. From A to Z]. Akademvydav. (in Ukrainian)
  4. Shynkaruk V. I. (2002). Filosofskyi entsyklopedychnyi slovnyk : blyzko 2000 sliv. [Philosophical encyclopedic dictionary: about 2000 words.]. Abrys. (in Ukrainian).
  5. Shynkaruk V. I. (2003). Filosofskyi entsyklopedychnyi slovnyk za red. V. Shynkaruka. [Filosofskyi entsyklopedychnyi slovnyk]. Abrys. (in Ukrainian).
  6. Shapar V.B. (2007). Suchasnyj tlumachnyj psykhologhichnyj slovnyk. [Modern explanatory psychological dictionary]. Prapor. (in Ukrainian).
  7. Jacenko T. S., Ghluzman O. V., Kalashnyk I. V. (2008). Ghlybynna psykhologhija: diaghnostyka ta korekcija tendenciji do psykhologhichnoji smerti. [Depth psychology: diagnosis and correction of the tendency to psychological death]. Navchaljnyj posibnyk. (in Ukrainian).

Submission

 
Flag Counter