The Bulletin of National Defence University of Ukraine

  • Received 02.04.2024,
  • Revised 19.05.2024,
  • Accepted 28.06.2024
Download article Download article
Vol. 19, No. 4, 2024
  • communicative interaction; foreign psychology; methods of experimental neurosciences; phenomenon; experimental approaches
  • https://doi.org/10.33099/2617-6858-2024-80-4-42-46
  • Pages 42-46

The article presents an analytical overview of the problem of communicative interaction in foreign psychology. It is noted that a wide variety of phenomena have been accumulated in the study of communicative interactions using the methods of experimental neurosciences, but the main provisions of the concepts that describe them often conflict with each other. At this time, many studies have been carried out within the framework of various experimental approaches

References

  1. Anderson, N., Bischof, W., Laidlaw, W., Risko, E. Kingstone, A. (2013) Recurrence quantification analysis of eye movements. Behavior research methods. Vol. 45. №3. P. 842-856. DOI 10.3758/s13428-012- 0299-5
  2. Botvinick, M., Ritter, S., Wang, J., Kurth-Nelson, Z., Blundell, C., Hassabis, D. (2019) Reinforcement learning, fast and slow. Trends in Cognitive Sciences. Vol. 23. №5. P. 408-422. DOI /10.1016/j.tics.2019.02.006
  3. Cichy, R., Kaiser, D. (2019) Deep neural networks as scientific models. Trends in Cognitive Sciences. Vol. 23. №4. P. 305-317. DOI 10.1016/j.tics.2019.01.009
  4. García, A., Ibáñez, A. (2014) Two-person neuroscience and naturalistic social communication: the role of language and linguistic variables in brain-coupling research. Frontiers in psychiatry. Vol. 5.P. 124. DOI 10.3389/fpsyt.2014.00124
  5. Golland, Y., Arzouan, Y., Levit-Binnun, N. (2015) The mere co-presence: synchronization of autonomic signals and emotional responses across co-present individuals not engaged in direct interaction. PLoS ONE. Vol. 10. №5. P. e0125804. DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0125804.g001
  6. Gunkel, D.J. (2016) Computational interpersonal communication: communication studies and spoken dialogue systems. Communication+1. Vol. 5. №1. P. 1-20. DOI 10.7275/R5VH5KSQ
  7. Hari, R., Himberg, T., Nummenmaa, L., Hämäläinen, M., Parkkonen, L. (2013) Synchrony of brains and bodies during implicit interpersonal interaction. Trends in cognitive sciences. Vol. 17. №3. P. 105-106. DOI 10.1016/j.tics.2013.01.003
  8. Liu, D., Liu, Sh., Liu, X., Zhang, Ch., Li, A., Jin, Ch., Chen, Y., Wang, H., Zhang, X. (2018) Interactive brain activity: review and progress on EEG-based hyperscanning in social interactions. Frontiers in psychology. Vol. 9. P.1862. DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01862
  9. Lyyra, P., Myllyneva, A., Hietanen, J.K. (2018) Mentalizing eye contact with a face on a video: gaze direction does not influence autonomic arousal. Scandinavian journal of psychology. Vol. 59. №4. P. 360-367. DOI 10.1111/sjop.12452
  10. Macdonald, R.G., Tatler, B.W. (2018) Gaze in a real-world social interaction: a dual eye-tracking study. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. Vol. 71. №10. P. 2162-2173. DOI 10.1177/1747021817739221
  11. Nummenmaa, L., Glerean, E., Viinikainen, M., Jääskeläinen, I.P., Hari, R., Sams, M. (2012) Emotions promote social interaction by synchronizing brain activity across individuals. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. Vol. 109. №.24. P. 9599-9604. DOI 10.1073/pnas.1206095109
  12. Pfeiffer, U.J., Vogeley, K., Schilbach, L. (2013) From gaze cueing to dual eye-tracking: novel approaches to investigate the neural correlates of gaze in social interaction. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews. Vol. 37. №10. P. 2516-2528. DOI 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2013.07.017
  13. Privitera, C.M., Stark, L.W. (2005) Scanpath Theory, attention, and image processing algorithms for predicting human eye fixations. Neurobiology of Attention. P. 296-299. DOI 10.1016/B978-012375731- 9/50052-5.
  14. Redcay, E., Schilbach, L. (2019) Using second-person neuroscience to elucidate the mechanisms of social interaction. Nature Reviews Neuroscience. Vol. 20. №8. P. 495-505. DOI 10.1038/s41583-019-0179-4
  15. Rogers, S.L., Speelman, C.P., Guidetti, O., Longmuir, M. (2018) Using dual eye tracking to uncover personal gaze patterns during social interaction. Scientific reports. Vol. 8. №1. P. 1-9. DOI 10.1038/s41598- 018-22726-7
  16. Rubo, M., Gamer, M. (2018) Social content and emotional valence modulate gaze fixations in dynamic scenes. Scientific reports. Vol. 8. №1. P. 1-11. DOI 10.1038/s41598-018-22127-w
  17. Scheller, E., Büchel, C., Gamer, M. (2012) Diagnostic features of emotional expressions are processed preferentially. PLoS ONE. Vol. 7. №7. e41792. DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0041792
  18. Schilbach, L., Timmermans, B., Reddy, V., Costall, A., Bente, G., Schlicht, T., Vogeley, K. (2013) Toward a second- person neuroscience. Behavioral and brain sciences. Vol. 36. №4. P. 393-414. DOI 10.1017/ S0140525X12000660
  19. Smith, T.J., Mital, P.K. (2013) Attentional synchrony and the influence of viewing task on gaze behavior in static and dynamic scenes. Journal of vision. Vol. 13. №8. P. 16. DOI 10.1167/13.8.16
  20. Yarbus, A.L. (1967) Eye movements and vision. Springer, Boston, MA, С. 171-211. DOI 10.1007/978- 1-4899-5379-7
  21. Yun, K., Watanabe, K., Shimojo, Sh. (2012) Interpersonal body and neural synchronization as a marker of implicit social interaction. Scientific reports. Vol. 2. P. 959. DOI 10.1038/srep00959
  22. Zhang, D., Yao, L., Zhang, X, Wang, S., Chen, W., Boots, R. (2018) Cascade and parallel convolutional recurrent neural networks on eeg-based intention recognition for brain computer interface. AAAI. P. 1703-1710. DOI https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1708.06578

Submission

 
Flag Counter