The Bulletin of National Defence University of Ukraine

  • Received 16.01.2025,
  • Revised 18.02.2025,
  • Accepted 26.02.2025
Download article Download article
Vol. 20, No. 2, 2025
  • personality activity; psychological research toolkit; coping strategies; strategies of behavior in conflict; negotiation strategies; decision-making strategies
  • https://doi.org/10.33099/2617-6858-2025-84-2-25-33
  • Pages 25-33

The article presents an analysis of the current toolkit for the study of behavioral strategies of an individual's life in three basic types of life situations – relations with the environment, interaction with others and relations with one's own self. Significant differences in the used tools in the national and foreign research space were revealed

References

  1. Amirkhan, J. H. A factor analytically derived measure of coping: The Coping Strategy Indicator. Journal of personality and social psychology, 59(5), 1066, 1990. URL: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/James-Amirkhan/publication/232472662_A_Factor_Analytically_Derived_Measure_of_Coping_The_Coping_Strategy_Indicator/links/0046352502b304320e000000/A-Factor-Analytically-Derived-Measure-of-Coping-The-Coping-Strategy-Indicator.pdf
  2. Baucells, M., & Sarin, R. K. Guided decisions processes. EURO Journal on Decision Processes, 1(1-2), 2013. Pp. 29-44.
  3. Blake, R. R. The Blake and Mouton managerial grid: leadership self assessment questionnaire, 1964.
  4. Bruine de Bruin, W., Parker, A. M., & Fischhoff, B. Decision-making competence: More than intelligence?. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 29(2), 2020. Pp. 186-192. URL: https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721420901592
  5. Cairns, R. B., Leung, M. C., Gest, S. D., & Cairns, B. D. A brief method for assessing social development: Structure, reliability, stability, and developmental validity of the Interpersonal Competence Scale. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 33(6), 1995. Pp. 725-736.
  6. Carver, C. S. You want to measure coping but your protocol’too long: Consider the brief cope. International journal of behavioral medicine, 4(1), 1997. Pp. 92-100.
  7. Carver, C. S., & Scheier, M. F. Attention and self-regulation A control-theory approach to human behavior New York Springer-Verlag, 1981.
  8. Endler, N. S., & Parker, J. D. Multidimensional assessment of coping: a critical evaluation. Journal of personality and social psychology, 58(5), 844, 1990.
  9. Folkman, S., & Lazarus, R. S. Coping as a mediator of emotion. Journal of personality and social psychology, 54(3), 466, 1988.
  10. Graham, I. D., & O'Connor, A. M. Preparation for decision making scale. Patient Education and Counseling, 1995.
  11. Kato, T. Frequently used coping scales: A meta‐analysis. Stress and Health, 31(4), 2015. Pp. 315-323. URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/smi.2557
  12. King, W. C., & Miles, E. W. What We Know—and Don’t Know—about Measuring Conflict. Management Communication Quarterly, 4(2), 1990. Pp. 222–243. URL: https://doi.org/10.1177/0893318990004002005
  13. Knapp, M. L., Putnam, L. L., & Davis, L. J. Measuring interpersonal conflict in organizations: Where do we go from here? Management Communication Quarterly, 1, 1988. Pp. 414-429.
  14. Lazarus, R., & Folkman, S. Stress, Appraisal, and Coping. New York: Springer, 1984.
  15. Mann, L., Burnett, P., Radford, M., & Ford, S. The Melbourne Decision Making Questionnaire: An instrument for measuring patterns for coping with decisional conflict. Journal of behavioral decision making, 10(1), 1997. Pp. 1-19.
  16. Miller, D. C. Adolescents' decision making in academic and social contexts: A self-regulation perspective. University of Maryland College Park, 2020.
  17. O'Connor, A. M. Validation of a decisional conflict scale. Medical decision making, 15(1), 1995. Pp. 25-30.
  18. Peltier, C., & Becker, M. W. Decision processes in visual search as a function of target prevalence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 42(9), 1466, 2016.
  19. Rubin, J. Z., Pruitt, D. G., & Kim, S. H. Social conflict: Escalation, stalemate, and settlement. Mcgraw-Hill Book Company, 1994.
  20. Scott, S. G., & Bruce, R. A. Decision-making style: The development and assessment of a new measure. Educational and psychological measurement, 55(5), 1995. Pp. 818-831.
  21. Siebert, J., & Kunz, R. Developing and validating the multidimensional proactive decision-making scale. European Journal of Operational Research, 249(3), 2016. Pp. 864–877. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2015.06.066.
  22. Thomas, K. W., & Kilmann, R. H. Comparison of four instruments measuring conflict behavior. Psychological reports, 42(3_suppl), 1978. Pp. 1139-1145.
  23. Weider-Hatfield, D. Assessing the Rahim Organizational Conflict Inventory-II (ROCI-II). Management Communication Quarterly, 1(3), 1988. Pp. 350-366. https://doi.org/10.1177/0893318988001003005
  24. Zacchilli, T. L., Hendrick, C., & Hendrick, S. S. The romantic partner conflict scale: A new scale to measure relationship conflict. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 26(8), 2009. Pp. 1073-1096. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407509347936
  25. Huitt, W. Problem solving and decision making: Consideration of individual differences using the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator. Journal of Psychological Type, 24, 1992. Pp. 33-44. http://www.edpsycinteractive.org/papers/1992-huitt-mbti-problem-solving.pdf

Submission

 
Flag Counter