The Bulletin of National Defence University of Ukraine

  • Received 22.04.2025,
  • Revised 11.06.2025,
  • Accepted 25.06.2025
Download article Download article
Vol. 20, No. 4, 2025
  • professional motivation; military personnel; combat experience; self-efficacy; locus of control; psychological resources; basic beliefs
  • https://doi.org/10.33099/2617-6858-2025-86-4-157-167
  • Pages 157-167

The article examines the psychological factors affecting the motivation of servicemen in the context of their combat experience. Based on the material of a psychodiagnostic study of 260 male servicemen, divided into groups with and without combat experience, it was found that military personnel with combat experience have higher adaptability, stress resistance and focus on social interaction, but at the same time demonstrate a lower level of emotional flexibility and a tendency to humorous perception of failures. Military personnel without combat experience have more advanced achievement and health internality, as well as a generally more positive perception of the world. It was concluded that combat experience transforms the psychological structure of motivation, strengthening the focus on responsibility, interaction in the team and social benefit, which requires special psychological support

References

  1. Babakhanyan, I., López, J., Caswell, M., Basham, A., & Bailie, J. M. (2023). Impact of Blast Exposures on the Cognitive Abilities of Warfighters. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 29, 156–157. DOI: 10.1017/S1355617723002552.
  2. Khanipour, H., Pourali, M., Atar, M., & Akbari, M. (2023). World Assumptions and Coping Related to Trauma as Predictors of General Mental Health and Acute Stress Symptoms Among Iranian Muslims During the COVID-19 Outbreak. Journal of Muslim Mental Health, 17(1). DOI: 10.3998/jmmh.1889.
  3. Mishra, V. K., & Jain, R. K. (2023). Locus of Control and Military Leaders: Relevance and Implications. International Journal for Multidisciplinary Research. DOI: 10.36948/ijfmr.2023.v05i02.1758.
  4. Prykhodko, I., Matsegora, Y., Kolesnichenko, O., Voloshko, S., Vintoniak, V., Vasyukova, N., Budahiants, L., Kuzina, V., & Motyka, S. (2024). Combat Stress in Military Personnel: Theory, Genesis, Prevention, and Control. Romanian Journal of Military Medicine. DOI: 10.55453/rjmm.2024.127.1.3.
  5. Schwarzer, R., & Jerusalem, M. (1995). Generalized Self-Efficacy scale. In J. Weinman, S. Wright, & M. Johnston (Eds.). Measures in health psychology: A user’s portfolio. Causal and control beliefs. PP. 35-37. URL: https://userpage.fu-berlin.de/~health/engscal.htm
  6. Stergiou, M., Robles-Pérez, J. J., Rey-Mota, J., Tornero-Aguilera, J. F., & Clemente-Suárez, V. (2023). Psychophysiological Responses in Soldiers during Close Combat: Implications for Occupational Health and Fitness in Tactical Populations. Healthcare. DOI: 10.3390/healthcare12010082.
  7. Приходько І., Колесніченко О., Мацегора Я., Мотивація військовослужбовців до діяльності в екстремальних умовах: систематизація досліджень. Проблеми екстремальної та кризової психології. 2021. № 2(2). С. 69-85. URL: http://dcpp.nuczu.edu.ua/images/2021-2/2021_2_7.pdf
  8. Тадеєва Т.В. Теорія самодетермінації Дісі–Раяна і навчальна мотивація. Наукові записки Тернопільського національного педагогічного університету імені Володимира Гнатюка. Серія : Педагогіка. 2012. № 3. С. 213-221. Режим доступу: http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/NZTNPU_ped_2012_3_40
  9. References:
  10. Babakhanyan, I., López, J., Caswell, M., Basham, A., & Bailie, J. M. (2023). Impact of Blast Exposures on the Cognitive Abilities of Warfighters. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 29, 156–157. DOI: 10.1017/S1355617723002552.
  11. Khanipour, H., Pourali, M., Atar, M., & Akbari, M. (2023). World Assumptions and Coping Related to Trauma as Predictors of General Mental Health and Acute Stress Symptoms Among Iranian Muslims During the COVID-19 Outbreak. Journal of Muslim Mental Health, 17(1). DOI: 10.3998/jmmh.1889.
  12. Mishra, V. K., & Jain, R. K. (2023). Locus of Control and Military Leaders: Relevance and Implications. International Journal for Multidisciplinary Research. DOI: 10.36948/ijfmr.2023.v05i02.1758.
  13. Prykhodko, I., Matsegora, Y., Kolesnichenko, O., Voloshko, S., Vintoniak, V., Vasyukova, N., Budahiants, L., Kuzina, V., & Motyka, S. (2024). Combat Stress in Military Personnel: Theory, Genesis, Prevention, and Control. Romanian Journal of Military Medicine. DOI: 10.55453/rjmm.2024.127.1.3.
  14. Schwarzer, R., & Jerusalem, M. (1995). Generalized Self-Efficacy scale. In J. Weinman, S. Wright, & M. Johnston (Eds.). Measures in health psychology: A user’s portfolio. Causal and control beliefs. PP. 35-37. URL: https://userpage.fu-berlin.de/~health/engscal.htm
  15. Stergiou, M., Robles-Pérez, J. J., Rey-Mota, J., Tornero-Aguilera, J. F., & Clemente-Suárez, V. (2023). Psychophysiological Responses in Soldiers during Close Combat: Implications for Occupational Health and Fitness in Tactical Populations. Healthcare. DOI: 10.3390/healthcare12010082.
  16. Prykhodko I., Kolesnichenko O., Matsehora Ya. (2021). Motyvatsiia viiskovosluzhbovtsiv do diialnosti v ekstremalnykh umovakh: systematyzatsiia doslidzhen [Motivating military personnel to work in extreme conditions: systematization of research]. Problemy ekstremalnoi ta kryzovoi psykholohii – Problems of Extreme and Crisis Psychology, 2(2), 69-85.
  17. Tadeieva T.V. (2012). Teoriia samodeterminatsii Disi–Raiana i navchalna motyvatsiia [Deci–Ryan's Self-Determination Theory and Academic Motivation]. Naukovi zapysky Ternopilskoho natsionalnoho pedahohichnoho universytetu imeni Volodymyra Hnatiuka. Seriia : Pedahohika – Scientific Notes of Ternopil Volodymyr Hnatiuk National Pedagogical University. Series: Pedagogy, 3, 213-222.

Submission

 
Flag Counter