ISSN 2617-6858
e-ISSN 2617-6866
The Bulletin of National Defence University of Ukraine
Vol. 17, No. 3, 2022
- Propaganda; hate speech; political psychology; cultural trends; illocutionary speech
- https://doi.org/10.33099/2617-6858-2022-67-3-112-119
- Pages 112-119
The article examines the psychological features of the perception of hate speech among the Ukrainian population. It is emphasized that hate speech is mostly spread with the help of propaganda, including digital propaganda, aimed at discrediting linguistic, religious or ethnic characteristics. It is emphasized that despite numerous studies, the concept of hate speech is sufficiently blurred, which leaves it relevant for scientific discourse
References
- Wilber, K. (2019). Trump and a post-truth world. Lviv: Terra Incognita. 135 p.
- Bauman, Z. (2002). The individualized society. Moscow: Logos. 390 p.
- Moore, T. (2020). Care of the soul: How to add depth and meaning to your everyday life. Lviv: Astroliabia. 448 p.
- Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. (n.d.). Hate speech. Retrieved from https://cutt.ly/6GgvX4W
- International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://cutt.ly/JGgv1g2
- Allied joint doctrine for psychological operations. (2007). Retrieved from https://cutt.ly/wGgv5r0
- Lapowsky, I. (n.d.). Trump and the risks of digital hate. Retrieved from https://cutt.ly/vGgbdab
- Koonz, C. (2003). The Nazi conscience. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press. 362 p.
- Bianchi, C. (2019). Asymmetrical conversations: Acts of subordination and the authority. Problem grazer philosophische studien, 96, 401–418.