- keywords: conflict; conflict interaction; constructiveness; personality; interpersonal relations; conflictogenicity
- https://doi.org/10.33099/2617-6858-2023-73-3-34-40
- Pages 34-40
At the current stage of the development of Ukrainian society, clashes in the plane of material, spiritual, industrial, interpersonal relations are telling. Constructive actions involve understanding the conflict nature, conflictological competence for solving conflictological situations, further prevention of conflicts, and timely diagnosis. Scientific studies on conflict interaction help to understand what factors cause conflict interaction, how to avoid them, to mitigate the driving force of conflict, to take into account methods and technologies for solving conflictogenicity, what consequences reflect on the behavior of the individual in the future. So, in our work, under the term «conflict», we see an open social system of relations and social development, a confrontation, a clash of opposite tendencies, assessments, principles, standards of behavior towards a person, which reflect the desire to approve principles, actions, ideas, to assert oneself, anticipating in its ontological core the structural heterogeneity of interests, which involve the incompatibility of group goals, mutual exclusion, which clarifies a limited number of scarce resources in the process of communication or joint activity between people. This definition of conflict intention is a working one that allows you to outline the field of conflict from other actions of individuals in order to harm or destroy an opponent between groups or individuals. In order to identify the essence of a conflict, it is necessary to establish its nature, to take into account the presence of interaction subjects who are aimed at understanding motives or judgments, as well as interaction in conflicts. In such situations, its functional arsenal is important for our understanding of the architecture of the conflict. The management of conflicts, their driving force, is a purposeful influence on the processes of conflict interaction, which should provide a constructive scenario for solving important tasks actualized in the conflict for society
References
- Bortun B.O. konfliktolohichna kompetentnist suchasnoho molodoho vchenoho. Molodyi vchenyi modernu – fundament rozvytku osvity, nauky ta biznesu v Ukraini: materialy II Vseukrainskoi naukovo-praktychnoi onlain-konferentsii (25 lystopada 2020 roku, m. Dnipro). Dnipro: KZVO «DANO» DOR», 2020. S. 227–232.
- Bortun B.O. teoretychna operatsionalizatsiia poniattia «konstruktyvna konfliktnist» osobystosti. Visnyk pisliadyplomnoi osvity: zbirnyk naukovykh prats. Seriia «Sotsialni ta povedinkovi nauky». 2020. Vyp. 12 (41). S. 28–46.
- Biliavskyi V.M. upravlinnia konfliktamy yak faktor staloho rozvytku pidpryiemstv. Implementatsiia innovatsii oblikovo-analitychnoho zabezpechennia staloho rozvytku suchasnoho biznesu: materialy I mizhnarodnoi naukovo-praktychnoi internet-konfonferentsii. Kharkiv: 2018. S. 15–17.
- Dzvinchuk D. konflikty ta sposoby yikh podolannia. Viche. No 5 (86). 1999. S. 11–16.
- Dutkevych T.V. konfliktolohiia z osnovamy psykholohii upravlinnia. Kamianets-Podilskyi, 2006. 276 s.
- Zinchyna O.B. konfliktolohiia. Kharkiv: KhNAMH, 2007. 164 s.
- Krasnova N.P. vydy konfliktiv u dilovomu spilkuvanni. Naukovyi visnyk Uzhhorodskoho universytetu. 2013. Vyp. 26. S. 108–111.
- Lozhkin H.V., Poviakel N.I. psykholohiia konfliktu: teoriia i suchasna praktyka. Kyiv: Profesional, 2007. 407 s.
- Matsiievskyi Yu. teoretychni aspekty analizu suspilnykh konfliktiv: mnozhynnist kontseptualnykh pidkhodiv. Liudyna i polityka. 2004. No 3. S. 115–129.
- Moroz O.O. teoriia konfliktiv v konteksti pobudovy zahalnoi modeli efektyvnosti suchasnoho pidpryiemstva. Vinnytsia: VNTU, 2010. 256 s.
- Nahaiev V.M. konfliktolohiia: kurs lektsii (modulnyi variant). Kyiv: TsUL, 2004. 198 s.
- Saimon H. administratyvna povedinka: doslidzhennia pryiniattia rishen v orhanizatsiiakh, shcho vykonuiut administratyvni funktsii. Per. z anhl. Kyiv: Art. Ek., 2001. 392 s.
- Svatko Yu.I. per aspera ad pacis, abo konflikty v haluzi derzhavnoho movlennia i derzhavnoho upravlinnia ochyma klasychnoi rytoryky. Filosofiia komunikatsii: Filosofiia. Psykholohiia. Sotsialna komunikatsiia. 2009. No 1. S. 76–89.
- Ponomarov O.S. ontolohiia konfliktu osoblyvosti pidhotovky suchasnoho fakhivtsia. Problemy vyvchennia konfliktiv. S. 97–103.
- Bortun B. analysis of the structure of the associative stimulus field «constructive conflict». European Journal of Education and Applied Psychology. 2020. No 1–2. S. 9–13.