The Bulletin of National Defence University of Ukraine

  • Received 18.10.2025,
  • Revised 03.03.2026,
  • Accepted 30.03.2026
  • Published 16.04.2026
Download article Download article
Vol. 21, No. 2, 2026
  • target audience; information operation; psychological operation; escapism; rumination; cognitive influence
  • https://doi.org/10.33099/2617-6858-26-21-2-99-107
  • Pages 99-107

In the context of the Russian-Ukrainian war, news content shapes emotions and behaviour, making it especially important to study the psychological mechanisms of influence, in particular maladaptive daydreaming, which increases audience vulnerability through immersion in imagined scenarios, detachment from reality, and functional impairment. The aim of the study was to analyse the relationship between the state of maladaptive daydreaming and informational and psychological influence through news content, as well as to test the hypothesis regarding the presence of triggers in news content capable of activating or intensifying this state. The methodological basis of the study comprised an interdisciplinary approach, doctrinal analysis of informational and psychological operations, content analysis, narrative analysis, and descriptive statistical processing of the results of coding maladaptive daydreaming triggers in news content. The empirical basis consisted of two blocks of internet materials, ten of which belonged to the Russian segment of the information space and ten to the Ukrainian segment. Each item was coded according to five parameters: the title of the material, the core narrative, the identified maladaptive daydreaming trigger, the probable psychological mechanism of influence, and the expected impact on the target audience. The characteristics of maladaptive daydreaming triggers in news content were identified, namely: narrative incompleteness and “serialisation”, oversaturation with emotional evaluations, intrusive modelling of future scenarios, personalisation of the war, hyperbolisation of threats or victories, as well as the use of multimodal amplifiers (clickbait headlines, audiovisual materials). The results of the study indicate that in the Russian block, counterfactual, catastrophic, fatalistic, and compensatory narratives predominate, modelling alternative realities, scenarios of rapid rescue, inevitable defeat, or final ending. Such semantic constructions potentially contribute to escapism, rumination, imagined restoration of control, and a reduction in audience agency. In the Ukrainian block, trigger potential was also identified; however, it is largely associated not with deliberate influence, but with the thematisation of trauma, loss, deferred life, exhaustion, and counterfactual scenarios – for example, “if not for the war…”. It was established that the vulnerability of target audiences to such messages may increase under conditions of prolonged stress, psychological fatigue, and mass traumatisation, which correspond to the conditions of the Russian-Ukrainian war

References

  1. Allied Joint Doctrine for Information Operations (AJP-10.1). (2023). Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/allied-joint-doctrine-for-information-operations-ajp-101.
  2. Allied Joint Doctrine for Psychological Operations (AJP-3.10.1). (2014). Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/ajp-3101-allied-joint-doctrine-for-psychological-operations.
  3. Andrews-Hanna, J.R., Irving, Z.C., Fox, K.C.R., Spreng, R.N., & Christoff, K. (2014). The neuroscience of spontaneous thought: An evolving, interdisciplinary field. ArXiv. doi: 10.48550/arXiv.1704.02533.
  4. Bigelsen, J., & Schupak, C. (2011). Compulsive fantasy: Proposed evidence of an under-reported syndrome through a systematic study of 90 self-identified non-normative fantasizers. Consciousness and Cognition, 20(4), 1634-1648. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2011.08.013.
  5. Burrell, J.I., Lawson, E., & Christoff Hadjiilieva, K. (2025). A dynamic approach to compulsive fantasy: Constraints and creativity in “maladaptive daydreaming”. Behavioral Sciences, 15(10), article number 1333. doi: 10.3390/bs15101333.
  6. Colpo, C. (2024). The effects of stressful life experiences and maladaptive daydreaming on selective attention among young adults. (Master’s thesis, The University of Tennessee at Chattanooga, Chattanooga, USA).
  7. Flood, A., & Keegan, R.J. (2022). Cognitive resilience to psychological stress in military personnel. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, article number 809003. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.809003.
  8. Haig, Z., & Hajdu, V. (2017). New ways in the cognitive dimension of information operations. Land Forces Academy Review, 22(2), 94-102. doi: 10.1515/raft-2017-0013.
  9. Ibrahim, F., Rhode, S., & Daseking, M. (2023). A systematic review of cognitive and psychological warfare. The Defence Horizon Journaldoi: 10.5281/zenodo.10205600.
  10. Kajimura, S., Nozaki, Y., Goto, T., & Smallwood, J. (2022). Not all daydreaming is equal: A longitudinal investigation of social and general daydreaming and marital relationship quality. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, article number 904025. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.904025.
  11. Lucas, A., & Bone, A. (2025). Introducing a psychological formulation model of maladaptive daydreaming. The Cognitive Behaviour Therapist, 18, article number e11. doi: 10.1017/S1754470X24000424.
  12. Nowacki, A., & Pyszkowska, A. (2024). It is all about discomfort avoidance: Maladaptive daydreaming, frustration intolerance, and coping strategies – a network analysis. Current Psychology, 43(8), 27447-27455. doi: 10.1007/s12144-024-03077-w.
  13. Osavul. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://www.osavul.cloud/.
  14. Pezzi, M., Zagaria, A., Miguel-Alvaro, A., Gámez-Guadix, M., Gori, A., Santoro, G., & Musetti, A. (2024). Maladaptive daydreaming and problematic online behaviors: A network analysis approach. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 177, 314-320. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2024.07.023.
  15. Pietkiewicz, I.J., Helka, A.M., Barlog, M., & Tomalski, R. (2023). Maladaptive daydreaming and narcissism. Personality and Individual Differences, 212, article number 112279. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2023.112279.
  16. Prier, J. (2017). Commanding the trend: Social media as information warfareStrategic Studies Quarterly, 11(4), 50-85.
  17. Rana, S., & Vyas, M. (2022). Maladaptive daydreaming: OverviewIAHRW International Journal of Social Sciences Review, 10(3), 370-375.
  18. Ricci, F., Valentini, C.P., Torales, J., Caycho-Rodríguez, T., Hualparuca-Olivera, L., Castaldelli-Maia, J.M., & Ventriglio, A. (2025). When imagination turns into disorder: The case of maladaptive daydreaming. International Review of Psychiatry, 37(6-7), 706-718. doi: 10.1080/09540261.2025.2562185.
  19. Soffer-Dudek, N., & Theodor-Katz, N. (2022). Maladaptive daydreaming: Epidemiological data on a newly identified syndrome. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 13, article number 871041. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.871041.
  20. Soffer-Dudek, N., et al. (2025). Maladaptive daydreaming should be included as a dissociative disorder in psychiatric manuals: Position paper. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 226(4), 238-242. doi: 10.1192/bjp.2024.279.
  21. Thomson, P., & Jaque, V.S. (2023). Maladaptive daydreaming, overexcitability, and emotion regulation. Roeper Review, 45(3), 195-205. doi: 10.1080/02783193.2023.2212634.
  22. Tran, T.-A., Abonyi, J., & Ruppert, T. (2024). Technology-enabled cognitive resilience: What can we learn from military operation to develop Operator 5.0 solutions? Production & Manufacturing Research, 12(1), article number 2368232. doi: 10.1080/21693277.2024.2368232.

Submission

 
Flag Counter