Bulletin of National Defence University of Ukraine

  • Received 20.03.2026,
  • Revised 27.07.2026,
  • Accepted 25.08.2026
  • Published 31.08.2026
Download article Download article
Volume 21, No. 4, 2026
  • resilience; plasticity; grief; psychological growth; families of fallen servicemen; psychological mechanisms; resilience
  • https://doi.org/10.33099/2617-6858-26-21-4-90-99
  • Pages 90-99

The full-scale war in Ukraine has significantly expanded the range of psychological problems that require scientific understanding, among which the study of psychological adaptation of people who lost loved ones as a result of military operations is of particular importance. The death of a family member is one of the most serious traumatic events, which is accompanied not only by the experience of grief, but also by the need for psychological adaptation to radically changed life circumstances. Therefore, the purpose of the study was to reveal the features of the functioning of resilience in the process of psychological adaptation of family members of fallen servicemen to war-related loss and highlight its main structural levels. To achieve this goal, a set of general scientific research methods was used, in particular, theoretical and comparative analysis, systematisation, generalisation, structural analysis, and modelling. The methodological basis of the research was systematic, integrative, and activity-based approaches to the investigation of psychological adaptation of the individual. Generalisation of contemporary Ukrainian and international scientific approaches allowed substantiating the author’s vision of resilience as an integrative psychological resource that provides the process of psychological adaptation to war-related loss, and not only acts as a personal property or the result of successful adaptation. It was determined that the specific feature of the resilience of family members of fallen servicemen is its functioning in the conditions of ongoing war, constant exposure to military threats, a high level of public anxiety, and the mass nature of war-related losses, which forms a specific socio-psychological context of adaptation. A structural organisation of resilience was proposed, which was based on four interrelated levels: cognitive, emotional, behavioural, and social. The functional purpose, psychological mechanisms, and role in the process of psychological adaptation to war-related loss were determined for each level. It was proved that the interaction of these levels provides a holistic process of adaptation, restoration of the viability of the individual, and integration of the experience of loss into the future life path. The practical significance of the results obtained lies in the fact that the proposed concept can be used as a theoretical and methodological basis for developing programmes for psychological support of family members of fallen servicemen, building models of psychological assistance, developing psychodiagnostic tools, and further empirical studies of psychological adaptation to war-related loss

References

  1. Assonov, D., & Khaustova, O. (2019). Development of resilience concept in scientific literature of recent years. Psychosomatic Medicine and General Practice, 4(4), article number e0404219. doi: 10.26766/pmgp.v4i3-4.219.
  2. Baidarova, O., & Klymenko, O. (2025). Strengthening the resilience of the wives of deceased military servants through support groups. Bulletin of Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv. Social Work, 1(11), 5-16. doi: 10.17721/2616-7786.2025/11-1/1.
  3. Bila, O.H., et al. (2024). Psychological resilience of personality under conditions of war. Cherkasy: Bohdan Khmelnytsky National University of Cherkasy.
  4. Bonanno, G.A. (2021). The end of trauma: How the new science of resilience is changing how we think about PTSD. New York: Basic Books.
  5. Burgin, E.E., Prosek, E.A., Shin, K., Cunningham, V.L., & Ponder, W.N. (2024). Needs assessment of surviving military families: Clinical symptoms and the parent-child relationship. Counseling Outcome Research and Evaluation, 15(1), 37-50. doi: 10.1080/21501378.2023.2257236.
  6. Chykhantsova, O.A. (2025). Resilience as a personal resource of Ukrainians under the military conflict conditions. Journal of Modern Psychology, 2, 146-153. doi: 10.26661/2786-7471/2025-2-16.
  7. Cramm, H., Norris, D., Venedam, S., & Tam-Seto, L. (2018). Toward a model of military family resiliency: A narrative review. Journal of Family Theory & Review, 10(3), 620-640. doi: 10.1111/jftr.12284.
  8. Fadeeva, A., Mann, E., McGill, G., Wilson Menzfeld, G., Moreland, M., Melling, A., & Kiernan, M.D. (2023). Bereaved UK military families: A mixed methods study on the provision of practical and emotional support. Death Studies, 47(4), 450-460. doi: 10.1080/07481187.2022.2089777.
  9. Hébert, M.L., Tippe, J.M., Aquin, C., Maximos, M., Brémault-Phillips, S., & Sevigny, P.R. (2024). Military family-centred resilience-building programming across the deployment cycle: A scoping review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 21(10), article number 1378. doi: 10.3390/ijerph21101378.
  10. Hrishyn, E.O. (2024). Psychological support for the development of resilience as a factor of self-regulation of an individual who experiences difficult life situations. (Doctoral dissertation, West Ukrainian National University, Ternopil, Ukraine).
  11. Kamene, K. (2025). Resilience through loss: Transforming grief into growth – a narrative review. Premier Journal of Psychology, 5, article number 100010. doi: 10.70389/PJP.100010.
  12. Klymchuk, V.O. (2021). Psychology of post-traumatic growth. Kropyvnytskyi: Imex-LTD.
  13. Kokun, O.M. (2025). Resilience and human hardiness in the modern world: Theory, research, practice. Kyiv: G.S. Kostiuk Institute of Psychology of the National Academy of Educational Sciences of Ukraine.
  14. Malimon, L., & Parkhomenko, V. (2025). Peculiarities of resilience of women with traumatic experience of loss as a result of warfare. Psychological Prospects Journal, 45, 91-106. doi: 10.29038/2227-1376-2025-45-mal.
  15. McGill, G., Mann, E., Moreland, M., Osborne, A., Kiernan, M.D., & Wilson-Menzfeld, G. (2023). Bereaved military families: Relationships and identity. Journal of Loss and Trauma, 28(6), 504-521. doi: 10.1080/15325024.2022.2127678.
  16. Panda, S.P., Chatterjee, K., Srivastava, K., Chauhan, V.S., & Yadav, P. (2024). Building psychological resilience in armed forces worldwide. Medical Journal Armed Forces India, 80(2), 130-139. doi: 10.1016/j.mjafi.2024.02.006.
  17. Podkorytova, L., Voloshyn, V., Shkarlatiuk, K., & Chyrkova, T. (2025). Psychological assistance to parents of fallen military personnel: Gender-specific aspects. Scientific Perspectives, 8, 1493-1505. doi: 10.52058/2708-7530-2025-8(62)-1493-1505.
  18. Tornero-Aguilera, J.F., Stergiou, M., Rubio-Zarapuz, A., Martín-Rodríguez, A., Massuça, L.M., & Clemente-Suárez, V.J. (2024). Optimising combat readiness: Practical strategies for integrating physiological and psychological resilience in soldier training. Healthcare, 12(12), article number 1160. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12121160.
  19. Turliuc, M.N., & Balcan, A.-D. (2024). Psychological intervention programme for developing resilience in the military personnel: A randomized controlled trial. Stress and Health, 40(4), article number e3399. doi: 10.1002/smi.3399.
  20. Yurkova, O. (2026). Living with loss rather than recovering from it: Meaning making and continuing bonds in war-related grief. Knowledge, Education, Law, Management, 1, 124-133. doi: 10.51647/kelm.2026.1.18.
  21. Yurkova, O. (2025). Grief experiences in the context of life and war-related loss: Ukrainian and international perspectives. Habitus, 80, 215-221. doi: 10.32782/hbts.80.41.
  22. Zhohlo, O., Rudenko, I., & Zhohlo, V. (2025). Personal resilience in war conditions: Theoretical principles of formation. Disaster and Crisis Psychology Problems, 2, 46-58. doi: 10.52363/dcpp-2025.2.4.

Submission

 
Flag Counter