ISSN 2617-6858
e-ISSN 2617-6866
Вісник Національного університету оборони України
Том 16, № 5, 2021
- персонал організацій; залученість персоналу; рівень залученості; фактори впливу на формування залученості
- https://doi.org/10.33099/2617-6858-2021-63-5-27-34
- Сторінки 27-34
Метою статті є теоретичний аналіз основних підходів, базових принципів та особливостей формування залученості персоналу в діяльність організації. Для реалізації поставленої мети вирішено низку завдань: розкрито зміст поняття залученість персоналу, проаналізовано різні підходи до її вивчення; виділено фактори, що визначають рівень залученості персоналу й оптимальні умови цілеспрямованого формування залученості персоналу організації
Використані джерела
- Macey, W., & Schneider, B. (2008). Engaged in engagement: We are delighted we did it. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 1, 76-83.
- Bakker, A.B. (2011). An evidence-based model of work engagement. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 20(4), 265-269.
- Masilova, M.G., & Burtceva, Iu.V. (2016). Personnel involvement as a characteristic of organizational culture [Vovlechennost personala kak kharakteristika organizatcionnoi kultury]. Territory of New Opportunities. Bulletin of the Vladivostok State University of Economics and Service, 3, 137–145.
- Kahn, W.A. (1990). Psychological conditions of personal engagement and disengagement at work. Academy of Management Journal, 33(4), 692–724.
- Maslach, C., & Leiter, M.P. (1997). The truth about burnout: How organizations cause personal stress and what to do about it. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
- Voitenko, E., Myronets, S., Osodlo, V., Kushnirenko, K., & Kalenychenko, R. (2021). Influence of emotional burnout on coping behavior in pedagogical activity. International Journal of Organizational Leadership, 10(2), 183-196.
- Voitenko, E., Kaposloz, H., Myronets, S., Zazymko, O., & Osodlo, V. (2021). Influence of characteristics of self-actualization and coping behavior on resistance of teachers to professional stressors and emotional burnout. International Journal of Organizational Leadership, 10(1), 1-14.
- Truss, C., Soane, E., Edwards, C., Wisdom, K., Croll, A., & Burnett, J. (2006). Working life: Employee attitudes and engagement. London: CIPD.
- Znamenskii, A. (2015). Involvement – myth or reality [Vovlechennost – mif ili realnost]. Personnel Management, 2, 41–46.
- Bazarova, T.Iu., & Eremina, B.L. (2012). Personnel management: A textbook for universities [Upravlenie personalom: uchebnik dlia vuzov]. Moscow: Iuniti-Dana.
- Ferreira, P., Gabriel, C., Faria, S., Rodrigues, P., & Sousa Pereira, M. (2020). What if employees brought their life to work? The relation of life satisfaction and work engagement. Sustainability, 12(7), 27-43.
- Ivanova, T.N., & Zorina, K.Kh. (2016). Changes in the practice of personnel management in modern organizations [Izmeneniia v praktike upravleniia personalom sovremennykh organizatcii]. Karelian Scientific Journal, 5(3/16), 125-128.
- Shchetіnіna, L.V., & Iastrubinska, A.Ye. (2017). Estimation of personnel involvement: meaning, requirements, and practical recommendations [Otcіniuvannia zaluchenostі personalu: znachennia, vimogi ta praktichnі rekomendatsії]. Retrieved from http://ir.kneu.edu.ua/bitstream/2010/22607/3/259-266.pdf
- Lozovskii, A.N., & Zaitceva, D.E. (2017). Increasing the economic potential of enterprises through the implementation of the engagement program [Pіdvishchennia ekonomіchnogo potentcіalu pіdpriєmstv shliakhom іmplementatcії programi engeidzhmentu]. Economy and Society, 13, 572-577.
- Khellevig, I. (2012). Personnel involvement in Russia. Preliminary version [Vovlechennost personala v Rossii. Predvaritelnaia versiia]. Moscow: Gaid Avarac.
- Konovalova, V. (2014). Personnel engagement management: factors of success and failure [Upravlenie vovlechennostiu personala: faktory uspekhov i neudach]. Kadrovik, 9, 74-84.
- Kular, S., Gatenby, M., Rees, C., Soane, E., & Truss, K. (2008). Employee engagement: A literature review. London, GB: The Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development. Retrieved from http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/336292
- Li, Y., Castaño, G., & Li, Y. (2018). Linking leadership styles to work engagement: The role of psychological capital among Chinese knowledge workers. Chinese Management Studies, 12(2), 433-452. https://doi.org/10.1108/CMS-04-2017-0108
- Fürstenberg, N., Alfes, K., & Kearney, E. (2021). How and when paradoxical leadership benefits work engagement: The role of goal clarity and work autonomy. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 94(3), 672-705. https://doi.org/10.1111/joop.12344
- Bei, G.V. (2018). Management of personnel development as a method of ensuring a high level of employee involvement [Upravlіnnia rozvitkom personalu iak metod zabezpechennia visokogo rіvnia zaluchenostі pratcіvnikіv]. Modern Economics, 8, 6-14. Retrieved from https://modecon.mnau.edu.ua/issue/8-2018/UKR/bei.pdf
- Rossier, J., Zecca, G., Stauffer, S.D., Maggiori, C., & Dauwalder, J.P. (2012). Career adaptability scale in a French-speaking Swiss sample: Psychometric properties and relationships to personality and work engagement. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 80, 734–743.
- Iakimova, Z.V., & Pushkina, A.S. (2018). Dynamics of the level of personnel involvement depending on the length of service in the organization [Dinamika urovnia vovlechennosti personala v zavisimosti ot stazha raboty v organizatcii]. Research Azimuth: Economics and Management, 7(1/22), 283-286.
- Deci, E.L., & Ryan, R.M. (2002). Handbook of self-determination research. Rochester, NY: University of Rochester Press.