The Bulletin of National Defence University of Ukraine

  • Received 17.11.2021,
  • Revised 29.11.2021,
  • Accepted 15.12.2021
Download article Download article
Vol. 16, No. 5, 2021
  • organizational personnel; employee engagement; level of engagement; factors influencing engagement formation
  • https://doi.org/10.33099/2617-6858-2021-63-5-27-34
  • Pages 27-34

The article aims to provide a theoretical analysis of the main approaches, basic principles, and specific features of forming employee engagement in organizational activities. To achieve this goal, several tasks were addressed: the concept of employee engagement was clarified, different approaches to its study were analyzed, and factors determining the level of employee engagement as well as optimal conditions for the purposeful formation of engagement in the organization’s personnel were identified

References

  1. Macey, W., & Schneider, B. (2008). Engaged in engagement: We are delighted we did it. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 1, 76-83.
  2. Bakker, A.B. (2011). An evidence-based model of work engagement. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 20(4), 265-269.
  3. Masilova, M.G., & Burtceva, Iu.V. (2016). Personnel involvement as a characteristic of organizational culture [Vovlechennost personala kak kharakteristika organizatcionnoi kultury]. Territory of New Opportunities. Bulletin of the Vladivostok State University of Economics and Service, 3, 137–145.
  4. Kahn, W.A. (1990). Psychological conditions of personal engagement and disengagement at work. Academy of Management Journal, 33(4), 692–724.
  5. Maslach, C., & Leiter, M.P. (1997). The truth about burnout: How organizations cause personal stress and what to do about it. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  6. Voitenko, E., Myronets, S., Osodlo, V., Kushnirenko, K., & Kalenychenko, R. (2021). Influence of emotional burnout on coping behavior in pedagogical activity. International Journal of Organizational Leadership, 10(2), 183-196.
  7. Voitenko, E., Kaposloz, H., Myronets, S., Zazymko, O., & Osodlo, V. (2021). Influence of characteristics of self-actualization and coping behavior on resistance of teachers to professional stressors and emotional burnout. International Journal of Organizational Leadership, 10(1), 1-14.
  8. Truss, C., Soane, E., Edwards, C., Wisdom, K., Croll, A., & Burnett, J. (2006). Working life: Employee attitudes and engagement. London: CIPD.
  9. Znamenskii, A. (2015). Involvement – myth or reality [Vovlechennost – mif ili realnost]. Personnel Management, 2, 41–46.
  10. Bazarova, T.Iu., & Eremina, B.L. (2012). Personnel management: A textbook for universities [Upravlenie personalom: uchebnik dlia vuzov]. Moscow: Iuniti-Dana.
  11. Ferreira, P., Gabriel, C., Faria, S., Rodrigues, P., & Sousa Pereira, M. (2020). What if employees brought their life to work? The relation of life satisfaction and work engagement. Sustainability, 12(7), 27-43.
  12. Ivanova, T.N., & Zorina, K.Kh. (2016). Changes in the practice of personnel management in modern organizations [Izmeneniia v praktike upravleniia personalom sovremennykh organizatcii]. Karelian Scientific Journal, 5(3/16), 125-128.
  13. Shchetіnіna, L.V., & Iastrubinska, A.Ye. (2017). Estimation of personnel involvement: meaning, requirements, and practical recommendations [Otcіniuvannia zaluchenostі personalu: znachennia, vimogi ta praktichnі rekomendatsії]. Retrieved from http://ir.kneu.edu.ua/bitstream/2010/22607/3/259-266.pdf
  14. Lozovskii, A.N., & Zaitceva, D.E. (2017). Increasing the economic potential of enterprises through the implementation of the engagement program [Pіdvishchennia ekonomіchnogo potentcіalu pіdpriєmstv shliakhom іmplementatcії programi engeidzhmentu]. Economy and Society, 13, 572-577.
  15. Khellevig, I. (2012). Personnel involvement in Russia. Preliminary version [Vovlechennost personala v Rossii. Predvaritelnaia versiia]. Moscow: Gaid Avarac.
  16. Konovalova, V. (2014). Personnel engagement management: factors of success and failure [Upravlenie vovlechennostiu personala: faktory uspekhov i neudach]. Kadrovik, 9, 74-84.
  17. Kular, S., Gatenby, M., Rees, C., Soane, E., & Truss, K. (2008). Employee engagement: A literature review. London, GB: The Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development. Retrieved from http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/336292
  18. Li, Y., Castaño, G., & Li, Y. (2018). Linking leadership styles to work engagement: The role of psychological capital among Chinese knowledge workers. Chinese Management Studies, 12(2), 433-452. https://doi.org/10.1108/CMS-04-2017-0108
  19. Fürstenberg, N., Alfes, K., & Kearney, E. (2021). How and when paradoxical leadership benefits work engagement: The role of goal clarity and work autonomy. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 94(3), 672-705. https://doi.org/10.1111/joop.12344
  20. Bei, G.V. (2018). Management of personnel development as a method of ensuring a high level of employee involvement [Upravlіnnia rozvitkom personalu iak metod zabezpechennia visokogo rіvnia zaluchenostі pratcіvnikіv]. Modern Economics, 8, 6-14. Retrieved from https://modecon.mnau.edu.ua/issue/8-2018/UKR/bei.pdf
  21. Rossier, J., Zecca, G., Stauffer, S.D., Maggiori, C., & Dauwalder, J.P. (2012). Career adaptability scale in a French-speaking Swiss sample: Psychometric properties and relationships to personality and work engagement. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 80, 734–743.
  22. Iakimova, Z.V., & Pushkina, A.S. (2018). Dynamics of the level of personnel involvement depending on the length of service in the organization [Dinamika urovnia vovlechennosti personala v zavisimosti ot stazha raboty v organizatcii]. Research Azimuth: Economics and Management, 7(1/22), 283-286.
  23. Deci, E.L., & Ryan, R.M. (2002). Handbook of self-determination research. Rochester, NY: University of Rochester Press.

Submission

 
Flag Counter