The Bulletin of National Defence University of Ukraine

  • Received 17.11.2025,
  • Revised 02.03.2026,
  • Accepted 30.03.2026
  • Published 16.04.2026
Download article Download article
Vol. 21, No. 2, 2026
  • psychological support; moral injury; regulatory functions; combatants; biopsychosocial model; case management; emotional self-control
  • https://doi.org/10.33099/2617-6858-26-21-2-53-60
  • Pages 53-60

This study was devoted to a comprehensive examination of the psychological mechanisms of self-regulation among military personnel of the Ukrainian Defence Forces in the context of the Russian Federation’s prolonged, large-scale armed aggression. The relevance of this work stems from the sharp rise in cases of post-traumatic stress disorder among combatants. In the context of high-intensity conventional warfare, the dynamics of stress reactions are cumulative in nature, necessitating a re-evaluation of classical approaches to rehabilitation and a deeper understanding of the regulatory processes of the psyche. The aim of this article was to conduct a theoretical and empirical study of the psychological structure and patterns of functioning of self-regulation mechanisms in military personnel with post-traumatic stress disorder to identify key regulatory factors of adaptation and provide a scientific basis for new approaches to psychological rehabilitation within the framework of a new state paradigm and military reintegration standards. The methodological framework was based on a combined strategy that integrated quantitative and qualitative methods. A survey was conducted on a representative sample (n = 1,534), in which 78.9% of respondents were combatants, and 50 in-depth interviews were carried out to verify qualitative patterns of adaptation. Standardised instruments were used for diagnosis: the PTSD Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5) and the Emotion Regulation Questionnaire (ERQ). Statistical analysis was performed using correlation, variance and factor analyses in the IBM SPSS Statistics v.29 software environment. The empirical data revealed a critical state of mental health among personnel: symptoms of post-traumatic stress disorder were verified in 89.2% of respondents. It was found that 45.2% of military personnel have significant deficits in emotional self-regulation, which correlates with the severity of the disorder’s symptoms. A high rate of lack of prior professional help (89.3%) was established, which is justified by the representativeness of the primary screening and reintegration stage. The most common self-regulation strategies identified were social support (39.2%) and physical activity (27.6%). Factor analysis enabled the identification of latent factors determining the adaptability of military personnel in stressful conditions. The study scientifically substantiates the need to integrate the author’s model for monitoring psycho-emotional state and methods of multi-component support into state rehabilitation protocols. The results can be used to improve the functioning of emergency and primary care units, facilitating the transition to systematic case management in Ukraine’s security and defence sector

References

  1. American Sociological Association's Code of Ethics. (2018, June). Retrieved from https://www.asanet.org/wp-content/uploads/asa_code_of_ethics-june2018a.pdf.
  2. Blevins, C.A., Weathers, F.W., Davis, M.T., Witte, T.K., & Domino, J.L. (2015). The posttraumatic stress disorder checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5): Development and initial psychometric evaluation. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 28(6), 489-498. doi: 10.1002/jts.22059.
  3. Boska, R.L., Bishop, T.M., Capron, D.W., Willing, M.M.P., & Ashrafioun, L. (2025). Difficulties with emotion regulation within PTSD clusters and moral injury subtypes. Military Psychology, 37(2), 159-167. doi: 10.1080/08995605.2024.2322904.
  4. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021). Thematic analysis: A practical guide. London: SAGE Publications.
  5. Field, A. (2024). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics (6th ed.). London: SAGE Publications.
  6. Flood, K., & Keegan, R.J. (2022). Cognitive resilience to psychological stress in military personnel. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, article number 809003. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.809003.
  7. Ford, B.Q., & Gross, J.J. (2018). Emotion regulation: Why beliefs matter. Canadian Psychology, 59(1), 1-14. doi: 10.1037/cap0000142.
  8. Greene, E.A., Serpico, E.J., Legault, G.L., & Williams, S.G. (2026). Staying relevant in the digital age: Exploring the evolving frontier of telehealth for mental health in the military health system and veterans health administration. Current Psychiatry Reports, 28, article number 8. doi: 10.1007/s11920-025-01651-3.
  9. Hall, K.E., Tull, M.T., & Gratz, K.L. (2026). Negative emotion regulation self-efficacy moderates the association between PTSD symptom severity and suicidal thoughts and behaviors in a trauma-exposed community sample of adults. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 82(1), 75-83. doi: 10.1002/jclp.70046.
  10. Kirkham, R., Liu, C., Wulundari, T., Aidman, E., Yucel, M., Wiley, J., & Albertella, L. (2025). Emotion regulation and coping in active military personnel: A systematic review. Stress and Health, 41(3), article number e70036. doi: 10.1002/smi.70036.
  11. Kline, R.B. (2023). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (5th ed.). New York: The Guilford Press.
  12. Kucherenko, N., & Prykhodko, I. (2025). Theoretical foundations of psychological resilience of military personnel. Honor and Law, 2(93), 106-112. doi: 10.33405/2078-7480/2025/2/93/339380.
  13. Matsehora, Y., Prykhodko, I., & Baida, M. (2024). Psychometric features of the express methodology “determination of the servicemen self-regulation peculiarities”. Honor and Law, 2(89), 91-105. doi: 10.33405/2078-7480/2024/2/89/309211.
  14. Ministry of Defence of Ukraine. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://mod.gov.ua/.
  15. Myloslavska, O., & Bohdanovskyi, S. (2023). Peculiarities of self-regulation of military personnel with different levels of resilience. Science and Education, 1, 51-57. doi: 10.24195/2414-4665-2023-1-8.
  16. National Center for PTSD. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://www.ptsd.va.gov/professional/assessment/adult-sr/ptsd-checklist.asp.
  17. Novikov, O., & Balashov, E. (2025). Model of monitoring and managing the psycho-emotional state of military personnel as a means of preventing and overcoming post-traumatic stress disorder. Scientific Notes of Ostroh Academy National University: Psychology Series, 18, 68-75.
  18. Order of the Ministry of Defence of Ukraine No. 1767 “On the Approval of the Procedure for Organising Reintegration Measures for Released Defenders of Ukraine within the System of the Ministry of Defence of Ukraine”. (2025, October). Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/z1767-25#Text.
  19. Order of the Ministry of Defence of Ukraine No. 516 “On the Approval of the Standard for a Modular Approach to the Organisation of Pre-Hospital Medical Care Provided During Military (Combat) Operations and During the Preparation of Security and Defence Forces for Their Intended Use”. (2025, July). Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/z1331-25#Text.
  20. Panda, S.P., Chatterjee, K., Srivastava, K., Chauhan, V.S., & Yadav, P. (2024). Building psychological resilience in armed forces worldwide. Medical Journal Armed Forces India, 80(2), 130-139. doi: 10.1016/j.mjafi.2024.02.006.
  21. Post, L.M., Youngstrom, E., Connell, A.M., Zoellner, L.A., & Feeny, N.C. (2021). Transdiagnostic emotion regulation processes explain how emotion-related factors affect co-occurring PTSD and MDD in relation to trauma. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 78, article number 102367. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2021.102367.
  22. Resick, P.A., et al. (2015). A randomized clinical trial of group cognitive processing therapy compared with group present-centered therapy for PTSD among active duty military personnel. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 83(6), 1058-1068. doi: 10.1037/ccp0000016.
  23. Seligowski, A.V., Lee, D.J., Bardeen, J.R., & Orcutt, H.K. (2015). Emotion regulation and posttraumatic stress symptoms: A meta-analysis. Cognitive Behaviour Therapy, 44(2), 87-102. doi: 10.1080/16506073.2014.980753.
  24. Shkvarok, A.K., Korost, Y.V., Turchak, D.V., Tedoradze, G., & Tatvidze, K. (2025). Impact of the full-scale invasion on the mental health of the population of the country in a state of military conflict: A study of regional trends in anxiety, depression, early symptoms of acute stress disorder and post-traumatic stress disorder. Medical Advances, 78(5), 967-973. doi: 10.36740/WLek/205350.
  25. Strøm, I.F., Aakvaag, H.F., Nissen, A., Skauge, A.D., Seifert, L.C., Nielsen, M.B., & Dale, M.T.G. (2025). The prevalence of childhood bullying and violence victimization and subsequent risk of adult revictimization in the Norwegian population: A cross-sectional study. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 38(3), 458-469. doi: 10.1002/jts.23145.
  26. World Health Organization. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://www.who.int/.

Submission

 
Flag Counter